opt-in vs opt-out

Discussion in 'Email Newsletters' started by popowich, Apr 29, 2015.

  1. popowich

    popowich EQ Forum Admin Staff Member

    Aug 12, 2008
    Likes Received:
    When discussing how to select which email addresses should be included in a mailing list the following comment was mentioned to me:
    My response was that I believe it's best to do everything you can to protect the reputation of your mail servers and domain name, and that opt-in is more correct even if it's likely to have fewer subscribers. I don't believe it's worth the risk of spam complaints to email everyone on a list of addresses, including those who are not expecting the email, hoping it generates some extra web site visits.

    Last edited: May 29, 2015
    Big Dan likes this.
  2. Big Dan

    Big Dan EQ Forum Moderator Staff Member

    Aug 14, 2008
    Likes Received:
    As an email user I wholly agree with the opt-in method. If I had a nickel for the number times some stupid site I ordered something one off from has added me to their mailing list without explicitly asking I'd be rich.

    As an email sender with my forums I use the opt-out method for certain things. If you've been inactive for 30+ days we'll send you and email digest with the most recent threads to try and spark your interest again. It's two click unsubscribe so I don't feel too bad about it.

Want to reply or ask your own question?

It only takes a minute to sign up (and it's free!). Click the orange sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.